back
Hardware Configuration for Win95

I'm just giving my personal estimate here, I could be wrong. Get whatever size monitor and hard drive you want, and choose the speed of modem and CDROM you need. If you're into sound you probably know more than I do about sound cards. I like the SB AWE32. You should try and get a motherboard with at least a 512k burst cache, as this will speed your system up nicely for a relatively small investment. I *think* most new motherboards come with at least 512k nowadays.

ConfigurationWhat you get
ProcessorRAMVideo
386DX4meg512kSlow system capable of running some applications
386DX16meg1megGood word processor capabilities; most simple applications will run fairly well; stick to the old versions of most programs
486SX8meg1megThis system will probably run similar but slower than a 386 system with 16megs RAM (see above)
486DX16meg1megStill a common configuration. This system will run slowly at times, especially when viewing multimedia and working with graphics, but it should be capable of running office applications with a fair degree of efficiency. It will not be sufficient for most new games on the market today.
486DX32meg2megBumping the RAM up to 32 megs and doubling video memory will enhance the speed of a 486 system quite a bit in windows 95. If you can run most applications in RAM they may load slowly, but once they're running you'll have a faster system than a pentium owner with 16megs of RAM. You still won't be able to run many of the new games available today.
Pentium-608meg1megOverall, this system will be about as fast as a 386 with 32megs of RAM. It is badly in need of more RAM because Windows95 will use just about all the available 8megs RAM, leaving nothing to run applications. This system will run some of the newer games, but not others.
Pentium-10016meg1megThis is not a bad system, but overall it's probably going to be slower than a 486 with 32megs RAM and 2meg video. The processor is faster, but it is limited by the speed of the hard drive and the video card. The more RAM you give to Win95, the more it will eat up. This enhances the speed of some tasks, but you really need 24megs or more RAM before you begin to see the benefit of having a fast processor. Of course, there are things you can do to limit the amount of RAM that is used by windows 95, such as using a small, tiled desktop background and avoiding installation of applications that increase the number of system fonts, and use 256 color instead of 16-bit or higher video modes. Anything you do to make your system prettier is likely to gobble up more available RAM and slow things down. The video card may be somewhat stressed, but this system should run just about any new game available today.
Pentium-10032meg2megsThis system is capable of handling 16-bit video mode, and running several system enhancements without slowing things down too much. It will be stressed only if used to open several applications simultaneously, some of which are RAM and processor intensive, such as Adobe Photoshop or other graphics applications. This system is not quite sufficient to be used as a network server, although it *could* do the job. I don't know of any new PC computer game that wouldn't run perfectly on this system.
Pentium-10048meg2megsThis is my home system. I use the 48megs of EDO RAM to load lots of system enhancements and fonts. I feel the current weakest point on my computer is the 2meg video card. Still, I can run 16-bit 1280x1024 graphics mode on my 17-inch monitor and view full-screen video without any noticeable jerkiness. I keep adobe photoshop, netscape, wordpad, LView Pro, gif animator, and instant 3-D open simultaneously when I'm doing heavy HTML and graphics work. The computer that this web page resides on is a Pentium-200 with 64megs RAM, 4megs video and a large SCSI hard drive. I really don't notice much of a speed difference between this system and my home system.
Pentium-20032meg2megsA typical new system being sold in stores today for around $1500. This system is equipped to run today's applications efficiently. It isn't going to be much faster than the P-100 system described above, however. Although the 200mHz processor is faster, this only comes into play for a few seconds when running most applications. It may require 2.5 seconds to open an application on a 100mHz machine, while it required just 1.5 seconds on a 200mHz machine. You save 1 second. Of course, faster is better, and the difference in cost between 100mHz and 200mHz processors isn't usually a lot.
Pentium-26664meg8megsThis system is suitable for use as a network server or for doing heavy graphics editing work, or just about anything you want to use it for. It's not a mainframe or dual pentium-pro machine and there are some things it's not capable of doing, but it's definitely a top-notch system even for the high-end user.

Footnote: The minimum hardware configuration for running win95 is a 386DX with 4meg RAM, and a 100meg hard drive

This configuration is suitable for running one small windows 95 application at a time. Windows 95 will require *about* 50 megs of hard drive space, so you'll have 50 megs for applications. All applications will run mostly from the swap file in this configuration. So, everything will be quite slow. If you want to run win95 on a 386DX, I recommend installing as much RAM as possible. This will allow you to run most applications with a fair degree of efficiency. A problem you might run into here, however, is that you probably need 30-pin RAM modules. Tracking down 30 pin modules any bigger than 4 megs each can be difficult, and I've found that 4meg 30-pin modules are similar in cost to 8meg 72-pin modules. If you have a 386, you should install Linux on it and use it to learn something about unix and perhaps C programming. If you want to run win95, buy another computer.

If you have a 286 or 386SX, you can't install windows 95 at all. This is because Win95 is a 32-bit operating system. The 286 has only a 16-bit CPU, and while all 386 computers have 32-bit CPU's, the cheaper 386SX variety runs on only a 16-bit motherboard. These 16 bit data pathways are incompatible with windows 95. Any 486 is fine, whether 486SX or 486DX. Both are 32-bit systems.